Archive for the ‘New Zealand Patents’ Category

Friday, February 13th, 2009

Change to PCT applications entering NZ national phase

The Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand (IPONZ) has changed the way that patent details for all Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications entering New Zealand national phase are captured.

From December 2008, patent details for all national phase applications will be copied from the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) database. The change in process means a reduction in the time taken to capture information and greater consistency in the way that IPONZ and WIPO format information. The changes apply to the following patent details:

  • Patent title
  • Applicant names and addresses (where the details match the application form)
  • Inventor names
  • Classification
  • Dates
  • PCT International Application Number
  • WIPO Publication Number

Tuesday, December 16th, 2008

IP Australia & IPONZ closures

IP Australia will be closed from 25 December 2008 to 1 January 2009 (inclusive).

The Intellectual Property Office of NZ will be closed from 25 December 2008 to 2 January 2009 (inclusive).

Any deadlines occurring on those dates will be accepted on the next business day.

Saturday, August 30th, 2008

RSS feeds

To date, users of this Blog have been able to subscribe to RSS feeds for each of the IP categories, or to all stories.

For technical reasons and in light of the relatively modest number of posts, we are rationalising our RSS feed options to one covering all posts. If you previously subscribed to individual category feeds, please subscribe to this feed. We apologise for any inconvenience.

Thursday, August 21st, 2008

Improved Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand Website

The Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand website has now improved its navigation, search and online transactions.

For more information about the changes click here

Tuesday, August 12th, 2008

Requesting Patent Foreign Filing Permits – Section 25(5) by e-mail

Where a NZ resident wishes to file an application for a patent abroad without first filing a corresponding patent application in New Zealand, the resident must obtain a foreign filing permit from the Commissioner under section 25(5) before making the foreign patent application.

IPONZ will now accept requests for foreign filing permit by email.

The request should name the applicants for the patent in the foreign country, and the countries or organizations in which the application is to be made, and include a description of the invention, preferably as an attached copy of the specification to be filed abroad or a detailed synopsis of the subject matter.

In response to the request, IPONZ will issue a permit (if appropriate) by reply e-mail. This will be the only form of permit issued and serves as the written permit as required under section 25(5).

It should be noted that a New Zealand resident does not need a foreign filing permit where:

(a) the resident has made an application for a patent in New Zealand for the same invention at least six weeks before intending to file a corresponding foreign patent application; or

(b) the resident is making a foreign application which is claiming convention priority from an application for the same invention filed abroad by a non-resident.

Tuesday, August 12th, 2008

New Patents Bill tightens up on patents process

The Patents Bill was introduced to Parliament on 9 July, and will replace the Patents Act 1953.

The purpose of the new Bill is to update New Zealand’s patent regime to ensure that it continues to provide an appropriate balance between providing adequate incentives for innovation and technology transfer while ensuring that the interests of the New Zealand public are safeguarded.

At present, the examination process under the Patents Act 1953 is less strict than in most other countries and in many cases had led to patents being granted that are broader in scope than patents granted on the same applications in other countries.

To address this issue the new Bill will provide NZ Examiners to consider the ground of inventive step during the examination of the application on a basis similar to that currently adopted in Australia.

The new Bill also contains measures that will assist in protecting the interests of Maori in their traditional knowledge and indigenous plants and animals and will reform the regulatory regime for the Patent Attorney profession.

Tuesday, July 22nd, 2008

New Zealand Patents Bill

The long awaited New Zealand Patents Bill having key provisions substantially modeled on the Australian Patents Act has been introduced into the New Zealand Parliament. It is expected that the first reading of the Bill and referral to the Select Committee should occur within the next few months. Once the Bill has been referred to the Committee, submissions will be invited. At this stage it is not possible to predict when the Bill will be enacted but it is unlikely to come into force before late 2009.

Tuesday, June 24th, 2008

Anti-counterfeiting trade agreement negotiations

Both the Australian and New Zealand governments have announced that they will join with a number of other countries (including the USA, Japan, Switzerland, Canada, Korea, Mexico and the EC) to develop an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) as part of an international effort to curb the trade in counterfeit goods and pirated works.

It is intended that ACTA will set a common standard for intellectual property rights enforcement in matters such as criminal enforcement, border protection measures and civil enforcement; and establish enforcement best practices and mechanisms for international cooperation.

Tuesday, May 13th, 2008

Restoration of priority claims for PCT applications

The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Rules have been amended to allow Member States acting as a Receiving Office or as a Designated Office to provide restoration of a priority claim up to two months beyond the 12 month Paris Convention deadline for international patent applications filed on or after 1 April 2007. Under the amended rules two grounds are available for filing of requests for restoration of priority i.e. that the international application was not filed within the 12 month convention period either in spite of “due care” required by the circumstances having been taken, or that the failure to file in time was “unintentional”.

IPONZ has advised that it will only allow restorations of priority on the condition of “due care” having been exercised. That is IPONZ will not allow the priority to be restored under the ground of “unintentional” failure to file. In applying the “due care” requirement, the provisions of section 93A of the Patents Act 1953 will apply.

Tuesday, May 13th, 2008

New Practice – contrary to morality objections

IPONZ has reviewed its practice with regard to raising objections under s17(1) of the Patents Act 1953.

Following this review, IPONZ will continue to raise objections under s17(1) where it appears that the use of the invention would be contrary to morality for New Zealand society as a whole or for a significant section of the community, including Maori.

As a general guide, claims to the following subject matter are likely to attract an objection under s17(1):
human beings;
processes which give rise to human beings and biological processes for their production;
methods of cloning human beings;
totipotent human stem cells;
human embryos and processes requiring their use;
placental and umbilical cord tissues and processes requiring the use of placental and umbilical cord tissues; and
transformed host cells within a human and other cells and tissues within a human.