EPIT2

Patentee under pressure

The decision of Ryan J in Wake Forest University Health Sciences v Smith & Nephew granting an interlocutory injunction to restrain infringement (previously reported here) has been overturned on appeal in Smith & Nephew Pty Ltd v Wake Forest University Health Sciences [2009] FCAFC 142. The main issue on appeal was whether the alleged infringer had sufficiently demonstrated that the [...]

Click here to see the full post
copyright

Amendments to trade marks and copyright laws one step closer

The New Zealand Trade Marks (International Treaties and Enforcement) Amendment Bill 2008 has been reviewed by the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Select Committee, which made a number of minor recommendations. If passed, the Bill will amend the Trade Marks Act 2002 and the Copyright Act 1994 to give effect to the Government’s decisions to ratify the Singapore Treaty and to accede [...]

Click here to see the full post
Trademarks

Hefty profits in trade mark infringement case

The Court of Appeal of New Zealand has overturned a decision to limit the period in which the trade mark owner was entitled to an account of profits in the cling-film trade mark infringement case Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd and or v Primary Distributors New Zealand Limited and ors [2009] NZCA 429. In summary, the [...]

Click here to see the full post
Life-Sciences

Interview on UWA v Gray decision

Corporate webcaster, Boardroom Radio, has today published an audio interview of Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick Lawyers partner, Chris Schlicht, on the Full Federal Court decision in University of Western Australia v Gray[2009] FCAFC 116. The interview can be heard here. The interviewer seeks Chris’s view on the prospect of success of a possible appeal to the High Court.

Click here to see the full post
registered

Tiffany TM tiff

Tiffany & Co has failed in its opposition to the extension of protection in Australia of an IRDA for the mark TIFFANY KOURY in Tiffany and Company v Tiffany C Koury [2009] ATMO 68. Tiffany & Co, the opponent, raised various grounds of opposition, however these principally relied upon establishing a likelihood of deception or confusion arising [...]

Click here to see the full post
Trademarks

Woolworths new brand under attack

There has been significant recent media coverage about the opposition by Apple to a Woolworths trade mark application, although this issue is not new. Major Australian retailer, Woolworths Ltd, launched a new brand for its supermarkets last year and sought registration of the following mark in almost every class. IP Australia advertised the application as accepted [...]

Click here to see the full post
Life-Sciences

Labels diffuse dangerous deception

In Schutz DSL (Australia) Pty Ltd v VIP Plastic Packaging Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 1049, the Court refused to grant an interlocutory injunction to restrain breaches of the Trade Practices Act as well as patent and trade mark infringement in light of undertakings given by the alleged infringer. The applicants (“Schutz”) sought an injunction on an interlocutory [...]

Click here to see the full post