Designs

Design by Committee ends in Revocation

Allen Hardware Products Pty Ltd v Tclip Pty Ltd [2008] ADO 8, saw delegate Herald consider an application by Tclip for revocation of certain registered designs in the name of Allen Hardware on the basis of lack of entitlement. The delegate considered that principles relating to inventorship under the Patents Act should be applied to [...]

Click here to see the full post
Legal-Services

Who pays the cost of copying?

The manner of calculating an account of profits by reason of copyright infringement was considered by Heerey J in Tenderwatch Pty Ltd v Reed Business Information Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 931. On the question of what proportion of the profits made were attributable to the infringement, his Honour considered that the use made of the [...]

Click here to see the full post
Trademarks

Barefoot and Fancy Free

In E. & J. Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Limited [2008] FCA 934, handed down on 20 June 2008, Flick J considered a claim by Gallo that Lion Nathan had infringed Gallo’s trade mark BAREFOOT, registered in relation to wine by the sale of beer under the trade mark BAREFOOT RADLER. On the [...]

Click here to see the full post
EPIT1

Commonwealth v Charlesworth – Entitlement

This case (The Commonwealth of Australia v John Murray Charlesworth [2008] APO 16 (3 June 2008)) related to a successful challenge by the Commonwealth of Australia, c/– Minister for Defence under Sections 32 and 36 of the Patents Act in respect of a water concentration measuring device conceived by Dr John Murray Charlesworth while employed [...]

Click here to see the full post